WHEN IS HIRING AN ALL NIGHT HOOKER LIKE PLAYING PAINTBALL?

January 6, 2008

You know – enough with the paintball history.  Its obvious that most are going to ignore it and the folks who bother to comment (most anyways) are so hung up on making their version of the past a reality that you can’t see the forest for the bullshit.

So.  I’ve decided to take the blog in a new direction.

From now on I’m going to concentrate on what’s happening today, this week and the future.  But I do need to tie up a few loose ends.

PSP:  They’re fucked.  Just like all tournament ball is fucked.  Here’s the straight poop:  If your team isn’t in with the ‘network’, you’re NOTHING except a ready source of cash.  No one sees you, or your team’s potential, they’ll never recognize your talent and you’re not going to be standing next to Ollie Lang in the penalty box.  You’re going to spend money you can ill-afford, you’re going to get bad calls, you’ll never get to win your arguments with the refs, you’ll get 15 total minutes of actual play time and end up with a little number posted next to your standings on the web – and that little bit of meaningless fame is going to cost you several THOUSAND dollars.  For NOTHING.

Have you ever really looked at the cost of your ill-considered tournament ball career?  Games are scheduled for five minutes these days.  Most last all of two.  Assuming you stay on the field for the entire length of every game and make it all the way through to the finals, you’ll have been on the field for 60 minutes.  For which you paid between $1000 and $5000 in entry fee alone.   That’s a minimum of $16 per minute – or three dollars per player per minute.

A $1000-a-night-hooker doesn’t even cost that much on a minute by minute basis.  Think about that.  Busting your nuts with a professional GIRL costs LESS than busting your balls in some cow pasture in Florida.  You don’t have to wear funny clothes – unless that’s your thing (and truth to tell the hooker might up her fee a bit if that’s the case), there’s no ref telling you what you can or can’t do, there’s no one else in there screwing around with your good time (unless you count the midget – but he costs extra too) and the electronics rarely, if ever, break down.  But no, you’d rather screw around with a bunch of guys and get ripped off in the process.  (Last time I checked, and it was merely for academic purposes, male prostitutes charge less than women but trannies cost more.  Go figure.  The point being that if you swing that way – which is a closer analogy to paintball than hiring a girl – the cost disparity is even greater.  What the heck – hire five guys and it will be just like stepping onto the field…)

There are two reasons that PSP has adopted its new ROF limit.  First and foremost is the fact that they’re now closer to the mandatory standards that will shield them from many liability issues.  They didn’t do this because they wanted to, they did it because they had to.  The second reason is because they’ve gone way overboard on the cost of play.  Teams just can’t afford to shoot the volumes at both events AND practice that are necessary to be even marginally competitive.  Its a sop to the economics prevailing today and has little or nothing to do with making the game more competive.  If they really wanted to address the issue, they’d go back to pump guns and/or gravity feed only hoppers.  Either or both of those would really bring the tactics back into the game. (Of course, tactical play is not the point of paintball tournaments.  Shooting paint is the point.) But then they’d run into the problem with the paint manufacturers.  Too little paint getting shot and the major sponsors will stop ponying up the little bit of support they’re actually providing. 

I’m not even going to start discussing ’sponsorship’, except to say that if you have to pay even a single thin dime for the support you’re receiving, its a lie to call it sponsorship.

Next posting, I’ll start with the new tack on things.  I’m going to take a look at cheaters (if you know of any, let me know and I’ll write all about it) and bad business practices – like the folks who pass bad checks and then hide behind their professional player status to get away with it.

Entry Filed under: Uncategorized. .

4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Paintball Thinker  |  January 6, 2008 at 10:39 pm

    I generally agree with your post.
    On sponsorships: It seems like sponsorships are an excuse to sell direct and cut out the retailer.
    On the rip off of tournaments: Selling paintballs and equipment has been the driving motivation of the tournaments. We are now seeing this model break down as guns are no longer a consumable that must be replaced each year. There is no longer a need for faster guns each season which created a whole new wave of hard goods buying. This has created an opening for change in paintball. It would be nice if the change is towards a game that is more enjoyable and maximizes participation. I fear that it will only by a change to maximize paint sales. The manufacturer now realize (I think) that rate of fire is hurting participation for more than just playing cost reasons. High rate of fire takes the fun out of the game for the recreational player.

    The PSP change is interesting to me in that it is only a token change. It seems like the paint manufacturers asked for a reduction in rate of fire. The equipment manufacturers did not object because they are unable to create a demand for faster and faster firing guns. (The paintball arms race is over).

    The idea that they made the change to get in line with safety standards is one which I wish was true. I doubt that it is. If they wanted to come in line with safety standards, they would have lowered the rate of fire to the point it actually was in line.

    The reasoning that I like the least is very possibly the truth. The paintball manufacturers see a price/cost increase coming. They lowered the rate of fire just enough that the amount of money spent on paintballs does not change in the tournament circuits.

    Regardless, when participation falls this year, some will blame the decreased rate of fire as the reason why.

  • 2. Furby  |  January 7, 2008 at 2:37 am

    What’s interesting is that my wife will allow me to spend $1000+ for a PSP event, but balks at the idea of a $1000/night hooker.

    Strange that…

  • 3. T-Square  |  January 7, 2008 at 2:55 am

    Good Stuff. Can’t wait for more!!

    http://tsquarepaintball.blogspot.com/2007/12/fans-speak.html

  • 4. gnomedplume  |  January 7, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    Thanks for the commentary.

    Furby – would that have anything to do with the fact that you are married? Funny how women react to various forms of entertainment in different ways…

    PS: Because of the actions of some, I’ve had to put the comments on ‘moderated’; if some people want to call that ‘taking my ball and bat and going home’ – whatever. This blog IS my home and I have always reserved the right to kick people out if they don’t know how to play well with others. In this particular case I feel absolutely no regrets about doing so. A certain person with associations to college paintball has a long habit of controlling discussion on his board through the liberal use of post deletion so, ’say hello to your new petard’ Mr. College Paintball, hoist it well…

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

January 2008
M T W T F S S
« Dec    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Most Recent Posts